[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] exciting new stuff for 2.0
From: |
Jerry Peek |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] exciting new stuff for 2.0 |
Date: |
Thu, 22 Dec 2005 13:02:15 -0700 |
On 22 December 2005 at 14:45, Michael Richardson <address@hidden> wrote:
> Is there any sane way to refile stuff (say a sequence) and specify what
> sequence it winds up in on the target folder?
Here's a halfway answer from refile(1):
If the "Previous-Sequence" profile entry is set, in addition to defin-
ing the named sequences from the source folder, refile will also define
those sequences for the destination folders. See mh-sequence (5) for
information concerning the previous sequence.
You could make a front-end script to refile that does the refile
job, then temporarily changes to that folder (with folder -push)
and renames the sequence from <previous-sequence> to whatever you
want (like the "mvseq" I just posted to the list), then uses
folder -pop to go back to the original folder. I think. ;-)
Jerry
- Re: [Nmh-workers] exciting new stuff for 2.0, (continued)
- Re: [Nmh-workers] exciting new stuff for 2.0, Jerry Peek, 2005/12/22
- Re: [Nmh-workers] exciting new stuff for 2.0, Paul Fox, 2005/12/22
- Re: [Nmh-workers] exciting new stuff for 2.0, Jerry Peek, 2005/12/22
- Re: [Nmh-workers] exciting new stuff for 2.0, Michael Richardson, 2005/12/22
- Re: [Nmh-workers] exciting new stuff for 2.0,
Jerry Peek <=
- Re: [Nmh-workers] exciting new stuff for 2.0, Joel Reicher, 2005/12/22
- [Nmh-workers] Re: exciting new stuff for 2.0, Bill Wohler, 2005/12/22
- [Nmh-workers] Re: exciting new stuff for 2.0, Bill Wohler, 2005/12/22
- Re: [Nmh-workers] exciting new stuff for 2.0, Joel Reicher, 2005/12/22
Re: [Nmh-workers] exciting new stuff for 2.0, Chad Walstrom, 2005/12/22
Re: [Nmh-workers] exciting new stuff for 2.0, Jerry Peek, 2005/12/22
[Nmh-workers] Replace mh-format?, Jerry Peek, 2005/12/22