|
From: | Mark Brand |
Subject: | Re: [Mingw-cross-env-list] [patch] upgrade packages glib gtk |
Date: | Mon, 26 Apr 2010 16:59:25 +0200 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.2pre) Gecko/20100308 SUSE/3.1b1-6.3 Thunderbird/3.1b1 |
Looking at the releases on gtk.org, it seems they follow the odd-unstable, even-release numbering system. There's been three releases of glib 2.25 in the past week - maybe we should revert to the 2.24 series, it's only just come out and they seem to have six month release cycle?I have no objection.Okay, so I reverted your glib upgrade completely: http://hg.savannah.gnu.org/hgweb/mingw-cross-env/rev/9b2c01f9779b
Going back to glib 2.24 causes the configure step to fail for gtk 2.20. Seems to have do with missing gio-windows-2.pc. This file came comes with glib 2.25 but not 2.24. The fatal error is actually "Can't find cairo-pdf.h", but I suspect it stems from the missing gio-windows-2.pc.
Maybe we should go back to gtk 2.19.6 version (before commit 7089cd796690). (Isn't that a development release though?)
By the way, if odd subversion numbers are development and even are stable, then it seems that a stable version of gtk can depend on a development version of glib. This is confirmed here:
http://osdir.com/ml/gtk-list/2010-03/msg00127.htmlThe simple strategy of "latest stable glib and gtk" seems untenable, since they may be mismatched.
-Mark
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |