[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [GMG-Devel] Gitorious aquired by Gitlab
|
From: |
Sam Tuke |
|
Subject: |
Re: [GMG-Devel] Gitorious aquired by Gitlab |
|
Date: |
Wed, 04 Mar 2015 12:11:24 -0000 |
|
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0 |
On 04/03/15 13:04, Jan wrote:
> Gitlab has announced, that it has aquired gitorious [1]
Just wow.
> Gitlab offers a community-edition which has a MIT licence, but they do
> run the proprietary Gitlab CE version on their public hosting site
> gitlab.com [2].
Hmm is there an indepependent assessment of the differences between the
Free and non-Free versions? If the non-Free parts are to do with their
particular hosted setup then personally I don't see it as a freedom
issue. But if it adds features that could lock-in users then it's
problematic.
Sam.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature