Re: [GMG-Devel] Survey requires nonfree Javascript

[Laura Arjona]

2013/11/12  <address@hidden>:
> That is not true? That the developers should test the code with LibreJS
> before releasing it? If LibreJS has a defect, they should notify the
> developers of LibreJS I would think. If LibreJS is fine, then the new
> conventions should be followed. In the meantime, i would avoid taking the
> survey.

Oh, sorry, I missunderstood. You mean the survey itself...
It's managed by Limesurvey, (limesurvey.org) which is licensed under
GPL v2. We didn't add any additional code.
I'll pass myself the tests and will report the problems upstream.
Thanks for your interest!
Regards
Laura Arjona

>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Joar Wandborg [mailto:address@hidden] On Behalf Of Joar Wandborg
> Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2013 10:39 AM
> To: address@hidden
> Subject: Re: [GMG-Devel] Survey requires nonfree Javascript
>
> On 11/12/2013 07:33 PM, address@hidden wrote:
>> Can the developer do their own testing with LibreJS to make sure
> beforehand
>> that their code will not be blocked?   *If LibreJS is blocking something,
> it
>> is likely non free.*
>
> Regarding the above emphasized sentence: That is simply not true, LibreJS
> requires some brand-new commenting conventions that previously have not been
> necessary to designate make a JavaScript file free.
>
> All of our JavaScript and code is released under OSI-approved licenses,
> LibreJS is simply not clever enough to detect it at the moment.
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.mediagoblin.org/listinfo/devel