[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Lynx-dev] Re: non-pkgsrc emacs or clone
From: |
Rick Kelly |
Subject: |
Re: [Lynx-dev] Re: non-pkgsrc emacs or clone |
Date: |
Wed, 25 May 2005 11:36:25 -0600 (MDT) |
Todd Vierling said:
>Please keep your (likely Linux-advocacy based) flamebait at home. The rest
>of us are working with third party software quite successfully on NetBSD,
>and it's unfortunate that you feel the need to have an unfounded temper
>tantrum about it.
But you are leaving silent the fact that "working with third party software
quite successfully on NetBSD" now requires pkgsrc. Standard open source
software used to build out of the box on NetBSD, an increasing number of
apps now don't.
--
Rick Kelly address@hidden
<http://www.rmkhome.com/>
<http://rkba.rmkhome.com/> - the right to keep and bear arms
<http://wolf.rmkhome.com/> - firearm forums
- Re: [Lynx-dev] Re: non-pkgsrc emacs or clone, (continued)
- Re: [Lynx-dev] Re: non-pkgsrc emacs or clone, Thomas Dickey, 2005/05/25
- Re: [Lynx-dev] Re: non-pkgsrc emacs or clone, Todd Vierling, 2005/05/27
- Re: [Lynx-dev] Re: non-pkgsrc emacs or clone, Thomas Dickey, 2005/05/25
- Re: [Lynx-dev] Re: non-pkgsrc emacs or clone, Charles Swiger, 2005/05/27
- Re: [Lynx-dev] Re: non-pkgsrc emacs or clone, Thomas Dickey, 2005/05/25
- Re: [Lynx-dev] Re: non-pkgsrc emacs or clone, Stef Caunter, 2005/05/25
- Re: [Lynx-dev] Re: non-pkgsrc emacs or clone, Thomas Dickey, 2005/05/26
- [Lynx-dev] Re: Standards compliance..? (Was Re: non-pkgsrc emacs or clone), Marc Tooley, 2005/05/27
- [Lynx-dev] Re: Standards compliance..? (Was Re: non-pkgsrc emacs or clone), David Maxwell, 2005/05/27
- [Lynx-dev] Re: Standards compliance..? (Was Re: non-pkgsrc emacs or clone), Marc Tooley, 2005/05/27
- Re: [Lynx-dev] Re: non-pkgsrc emacs or clone,
Rick Kelly <=
- Re: [Lynx-dev] Re: non-pkgsrc emacs or clone, Martin Husemann, 2005/05/27