[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Lynx-dev] Re: non-pkgsrc emacs or clone
From: |
Martin Husemann |
Subject: |
Re: [Lynx-dev] Re: non-pkgsrc emacs or clone |
Date: |
Thu, 26 May 2005 19:05:03 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4.2.1i |
On Wed, May 25, 2005 at 11:36:25AM -0600, Rick Kelly wrote:
> But you are leaving silent the fact that "working with third party software
> quite successfully on NetBSD" now requires pkgsrc.
Not requires. It's just the convenient way, used by nearly everyone.
> Standard open source
> software used to build out of the box on NetBSD, an increasing number of
> apps now don't.
So mail patches to their authors, or file PRs if something is broken in
NetBSD. But please no PRs like "downgrade gcc to 2.95.x, so that emacs
works out of the box again" ;-)
Martin
- Re: [Lynx-dev] Re: non-pkgsrc emacs or clone, (continued)
- Re: [Lynx-dev] Re: non-pkgsrc emacs or clone, Todd Vierling, 2005/05/27
- Re: [Lynx-dev] Re: non-pkgsrc emacs or clone, Thomas Dickey, 2005/05/25
- Re: [Lynx-dev] Re: non-pkgsrc emacs or clone, Charles Swiger, 2005/05/27
- Re: [Lynx-dev] Re: non-pkgsrc emacs or clone, Thomas Dickey, 2005/05/25
- Re: [Lynx-dev] Re: non-pkgsrc emacs or clone, Stef Caunter, 2005/05/25
- Re: [Lynx-dev] Re: non-pkgsrc emacs or clone, Thomas Dickey, 2005/05/26
- [Lynx-dev] Re: Standards compliance..? (Was Re: non-pkgsrc emacs or clone), Marc Tooley, 2005/05/27
- [Lynx-dev] Re: Standards compliance..? (Was Re: non-pkgsrc emacs or clone), David Maxwell, 2005/05/27
- [Lynx-dev] Re: Standards compliance..? (Was Re: non-pkgsrc emacs or clone), Marc Tooley, 2005/05/27
- Re: [Lynx-dev] Re: non-pkgsrc emacs or clone, Rick Kelly, 2005/05/27
- Re: [Lynx-dev] Re: non-pkgsrc emacs or clone,
Martin Husemann <=