[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Lynx-dev] Re: Standards compliance..? (Was Re: non-pkgsrc emacs or clon
From: |
David Maxwell |
Subject: |
[Lynx-dev] Re: Standards compliance..? (Was Re: non-pkgsrc emacs or clone) |
Date: |
Wed, 25 May 2005 15:44:39 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4.2.1i |
On Wed, May 25, 2005 at 11:07:37AM -0700, Marc Tooley wrote:
> On Wednesday 25 May 2005 08:59, Todd Vierling wrote:
> > Please keep your (likely Linux-advocacy based) flamebait at home.
> > The rest of us are working with third party software quite
> > successfully on NetBSD, and it's unfortunate that you feel the need
> > to have an unfounded temper tantrum about it.
>
> I'm pretty sure there was a NetBSD commit to fix mkdir() (and other
> calls) so they worked with a trailing slash, in violation of the Single
> UNIX Standard which states that all trailing slashes must be
> interpreted as "/." everywhere. Many applications made assumptions
> about it apparently, because it "just worked" on so many other
> platforms.
Nope. The SUS didn't specify the behaviour in the case of mkdir, because
the argument to mkdir(2) is not (yet) a directory, it's a name for which
you wish to create a directory.
So, the decision was easy to make - compatibility, given that no
standard had to be violated.
David
- Re: [Lynx-dev] Re: non-pkgsrc emacs or clone, (continued)
- Re: [Lynx-dev] Re: non-pkgsrc emacs or clone, Thomas Dickey, 2005/05/25
- Re: [Lynx-dev] Re: non-pkgsrc emacs or clone, Todd Vierling, 2005/05/27
- Re: [Lynx-dev] Re: non-pkgsrc emacs or clone, Thomas Dickey, 2005/05/25
- Re: [Lynx-dev] Re: non-pkgsrc emacs or clone, Todd Vierling, 2005/05/27
- Re: [Lynx-dev] Re: non-pkgsrc emacs or clone, Thomas Dickey, 2005/05/25
- Re: [Lynx-dev] Re: non-pkgsrc emacs or clone, Charles Swiger, 2005/05/27
- Re: [Lynx-dev] Re: non-pkgsrc emacs or clone, Thomas Dickey, 2005/05/25
- Re: [Lynx-dev] Re: non-pkgsrc emacs or clone, Stef Caunter, 2005/05/25
- Re: [Lynx-dev] Re: non-pkgsrc emacs or clone, Thomas Dickey, 2005/05/26
- [Lynx-dev] Re: Standards compliance..? (Was Re: non-pkgsrc emacs or clone), Marc Tooley, 2005/05/27
- [Lynx-dev] Re: Standards compliance..? (Was Re: non-pkgsrc emacs or clone),
David Maxwell <=
- [Lynx-dev] Re: Standards compliance..? (Was Re: non-pkgsrc emacs or clone), Marc Tooley, 2005/05/27
- Re: [Lynx-dev] Re: non-pkgsrc emacs or clone, Rick Kelly, 2005/05/27
- Re: [Lynx-dev] Re: non-pkgsrc emacs or clone, Martin Husemann, 2005/05/27