[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: lynx-dev Overriding broken gcc (Was: [2.8.1] why no bold links?)
From: |
Webmaster Jim |
Subject: |
Re: lynx-dev Overriding broken gcc (Was: [2.8.1] why no bold links?) |
Date: |
Fri, 12 Mar 1999 13:45:03 -0500 |
On Fri, Mar 12, 1999 at 07:50:13PM +1100, Tim Benham wrote:
>
> Thanks, the CC=cc advice was what was needed. Perhaps this could be
> added to the PROBLEMS file as I'm sure it'll happen for someone else.
It's partly in INSTALLATION. Perhaps this is more detailed:
*** INSTALLATION.df Thu Mar 4 05:39:45 1999
--- INSTALLATION Fri Mar 12 13:42:04 1999
***************
*** 394,400 ****
values rather than computing new ones. Useful variables include:
CC - the C compiler. If you do not override this, configure
! will try to use gcc.
CFLAGS - the C compiler options. These also include C
preprocessor options (such as -I), since the $CFLAGS and
--- 394,401 ----
values rather than computing new ones. Useful variables include:
CC - the C compiler. If you do not override this, configure
! will try to use gcc. For instance, setting CC=cc and
! exporting this value will cause configure to use cc instead.
CFLAGS - the C compiler options. These also include C
preprocessor options (such as -I), since the $CFLAGS and
------
<http://www.cs.indiana.edu/picons/db/users/us/md/lib/bcpl/jspath/face.xbm>
<http://www.altavista.com/cgi-bin/query?q=%22web+home+for+jim+spath%22>
Marvin the Paranoid Android says:
How do you think I feel?
Re: lynx-dev [2.8.1] why no bold links?, dickey, 1999/03/10