[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: lynx-dev [2.8.1] why no bold links?
From: |
dickey |
Subject: |
Re: lynx-dev [2.8.1] why no bold links? |
Date: |
Wed, 10 Mar 1999 08:39:32 -0500 (EST) |
> I have another problem with the configure script now that I am trying
> to install 2.81 at my university (this time as a user without root
> privs). The configure script dies when it discovers that gcc is broken
> despite the fact there is a perfectly good ANSI cc in the PATH. It
> seems to me this could be improved.
which one is first in the path? (this is really a separate problem - autoconf
or your environment: the former if the configure script picks up a program
in the wrong order in the path, or your environment if you don't reorder
$PATH to make it workable).
>
> Tim
>
--
Thomas E. Dickey
address@hidden
http://www.clark.net/pub/dickey
- Re: lynx-dev [2.8.1] why no bold links?, (continued)
Re: lynx-dev [2.8.1] why no bold links?, dickey, 1999/03/06
Re: lynx-dev [2.8.1] why no bold links?, dickey, 1999/03/07
Re: lynx-dev [2.8.1] why no bold links?, dickey, 1999/03/07
Re: lynx-dev [2.8.1] why no bold links?,
dickey <=