Re: lynx-dev Overriding broken gcc (Was: [2.8.1] why no bold links?)

lynx-dev

From:	Tim Benham
Subject:	Re: lynx-dev Overriding broken gcc (Was: [2.8.1] why no bold links?)
Date:	Fri, 12 Mar 1999 19:50:13 +1100

Thanks, the CC=cc advice was what was needed. Perhaps this could be
added to the PROBLEMS file as I'm sure it'll happen for someone else.

Tim

Current Thread

[Next in Thread]

Re: lynx-dev [2.8.1] why no bold links?, (continued)
- Re: lynx-dev [2.8.1] why no bold links?, David Woolley, 1999/03/07
- Re: lynx-dev [2.8.1] why no bold links?, dickey, 1999/03/06
  - Re: lynx-dev [2.8.1] why no bold links?, Leonid Pauzner, 1999/03/06
    - Re: lynx-dev [2.8.1] why no bold links?, Tim Benham, 1999/03/06
    - Re: lynx-dev [2.8.1] why no bold links?, Klaus Weide, 1999/03/07
- Re: lynx-dev [2.8.1] why no bold links?, dickey, 1999/03/06
- Re: lynx-dev [2.8.1] why no bold links?, dickey, 1999/03/07
- Re: lynx-dev [2.8.1] why no bold links?, dickey, 1999/03/07
  - Re: lynx-dev [2.8.1] why no bold links?, Tim Benham, 1999/03/10
    - Re: lynx-dev Overriding broken gcc (Was: [2.8.1] why no bold links?), Serge Munhoven, 1999/03/11
    - Re: lynx-dev Overriding broken gcc (Was: [2.8.1] why no bold links?), Tim Benham <=
    - Re: lynx-dev Overriding broken gcc (Was: [2.8.1] why no bold links?), Webmaster Jim, 1999/03/12
    - lynx-dev broken gcc (doc patch), Philip Webb, 1999/03/12
- Re: lynx-dev [2.8.1] why no bold links?, dickey, 1999/03/10
  - Re: lynx-dev [2.8.1] why no bold links?, Webmaster Jim, 1999/03/10
  - Re: lynx-dev [2.8.1] why no bold links?, pg, 1999/03/10
  - Re: lynx-dev [2.8.1] why no bold links?, Tim Benham, 1999/03/11
    - Re: lynx-dev [2.8.1] why no bold links?, Larry W. Virden, 1999/03/11