[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: lynx-dev LYNX: "—": em-dash?
From: |
brian j. pardy |
Subject: |
Re: lynx-dev LYNX: "—": em-dash? |
Date: |
Thu, 3 Sep 1998 19:16:56 -0700 |
Philip Webb wrote:
> 980903 David Combs wrote:
> > This code: who—he's my boss—who runs
> > comes out as who-he's my boss-who runs .
> > maybe we should show it as "--" or, even better, as " -- ".
>
> yes, i've noticed this regularly in one newspaper (Washington Post?).
> you're right, it should be ` -- ': that's correct secretarial style.
>
> and while we're on it, Lynx should write 2 spaces after a full stop:
> that's also professional secretarial practice.
I don't think that lynx should be in the business of correcting
punctuational errors/preferences when it comes to text presented on the
web -- I'd much prefer to leave that to the whim of the author.
At the least, it should be a compile-time definition, IMO.
--
"We have no clue." -Delrish Moss, Miami PD
"Very few profundities can be expressed in less than 80 characters." -anon
- lynx-dev LYNX: "—": em-dash?, David Combs, 1998/09/03
- Re: lynx-dev LYNX: "—": em-dash?, Philip Webb, 1998/09/03
- Re: lynx-dev LYNX: "—": em-dash?,
brian j. pardy <=
- Re: lynx-dev LYNX: "—": em-dash?, pg, 1998/09/04
- Re: lynx-dev LYNX: "—": em-dash?, brian j. pardy, 1998/09/04
- Re: lynx-dev LYNX: "—": em-dash?, Philip Webb, 1998/09/04
- Re: lynx-dev LYNX: "—": em-dash?, Doug Kaufman, 1998/09/05
- Re: lynx-dev LYNX: "—": em-dash?, Philip Webb, 1998/09/05
- Re: lynx-dev LYNX: "—": em-dash?, Heikki Kantola, 1998/09/04
- Re: lynx-dev LYNX: "—": em-dash?, Christian Weisgerber, 1998/09/05