[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [lwip-devel] netif->flags: u8_t -> u16_t ?

From: address@hidden
Subject: Re: [lwip-devel] netif->flags: u8_t -> u16_t ?
Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2015 21:47:28 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0

I forgot to add:

> I'm trying to do some further work on IPv6.

Cool! Although our marketing guys can't seem to generate a need for IPv6 among our customers, I really appreciate your work on this!

> Also, agree with Simon on IPv6 being optional. Although there has also been a request for > IPv4 be made optional and I can see use cases for this, especially considering 6LowPAN WSNs
> (which I'm working on right now)

I think when it comes to a single-version stack, one is as good as the other and we should support both. In fact, there is already a bug tracker entry for this.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]