[lwip-devel] [patch #6699] Fixing a couple of compilation warnings(Paradigm C++)

[Bill Auerbach]

Follow-up Comment #10, patch #6699 (project lwip):

Wouldn't it remove the warning that started this post?  It's also marginally
more efficient to leave ints and unsigned ints as ints or unsigned ints and
not as u16_t/u32_t s_16t/u_16t because int is the native type and most
efficient type for the processor.  Why force 16/32 bits when there's no
benefit gained from doing so?

Bill

    _______________________________________________________

Reply to this item at:

  <http://savannah.nongnu.org/patch/?6699>

_______________________________________________
  Message sent via/by Savannah
  http://savannah.nongnu.org/