[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[lwip-devel] [task #6969] Review usage of conn->err in netconn layer

From: Simon Goldschmidt
Subject: [lwip-devel] [task #6969] Review usage of conn->err in netconn layer
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2007 18:51:49 +0000
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; de; rv: Gecko/20071025 Firefox/

Follow-up Comment #25, task #6969 (project lwip):

On the one hand, you're right: marking the whole connection as dead because
of one packet isn't good. But on the other hand, a TCP packet that is enqueued
and can't be sent because it is too long will never be split up, so the whole
connection *is* dead, anyway.

Maybe we should define what the difference between ERR_MEM and ERR_BUF is. I
think returning ERR_BUF here might work...


Reply to this item at:


  Nachricht geschickt von/durch Savannah

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]