|
From: | Jacques Peron |
Subject: | Re: [OT] Linux Users |
Date: | Sun, 19 Nov 2017 20:06:44 +0100 |
> As far as I can tell the cleanest (and easiest) way would be to
> publish the package on CTAN so it will be included in TeX distros like
> TeXLive (like it is the case with lilyglyphs).
*Then* of course it
> should be mentioned in the LilyPond docs too.
I fail to see why it uses different syntax for embedding LilyPond code
than lilypond-book does, though. Why not make it compatible by just
adding the right \usepackage invocation?
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |