[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [OT] Linux Users
From: |
Br. Samuel Springuel |
Subject: |
Re: [OT] Linux Users |
Date: |
Sun, 19 Nov 2017 14:06:13 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.4.0 |
On 2017-11-19 12:12 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
I fail to see why it uses different syntax for embedding LilyPond code
than lilypond-book does, though. Why not make it compatible by just
adding the right \usepackage invocation?
Actually, the package does define some aliases which should allow mostly
for a `\usepackage` drop in. Full compatibility, however, I don't think
is possible because of command conflict:
It is not possible to have a command named `\lilypond` and an
environment named `lilypond` in the same LaTeX document. Internally,
`\newenvironment{lilypond}` defines two commands: `\lilypond` and
`\endlilypond` (which correspond to `\begin{lilypond}` and
`\end{lilypond}`). The former command will conflict with attempts to
define `\lilypond` as an independent command (raising an "Command
already defined" error). Since lilypond-book is a preprocessor which
swaps out these sections for valid code based on `\includegraphics` it
can ignore this LaTeX restriction. Since lyluatex functions from within
LaTeX, it cannot.
--
✝✝✝✝✝✝✝✝✝✝✝✝✝✝✝✝✝✝✝✝✝✝✝✝✝
Br. Samuel, OSB
St. Anselm’s Abbey
Washington, DC
(R. Padraic Springuel)
PAX ☧ ΧΡΙΣΤΟΣ
- Re: [OT] Linux Users, (continued)
- Re: [OT] Linux Users, Jan-Peter Voigt, 2017/11/18
- Re: [OT] Linux Users, Urs Liska, 2017/11/18
- Re: [OT] Linux Users, Sam Bivens, 2017/11/18
- Re: [OT] Linux Users, David Bellows, 2017/11/18
- Re: [OT] Linux Users, Jacques Peron, 2017/11/18
- Re: [OT] Linux Users, Marc Hohl, 2017/11/19
- Re: [OT] Linux Users, Urs Liska, 2017/11/19
- Re: [OT] Linux Users, Malte Meyn, 2017/11/19
- Re: [OT] Linux Users, Urs Liska, 2017/11/19
- Re: [OT] Linux Users, David Kastrup, 2017/11/19
- Re: [OT] Linux Users,
Br. Samuel Springuel <=
- Message not available
- Re: [OT] Linux Users, Jacques Peron, 2017/11/19
- Re: [OT] Linux Users, David Kastrup, 2017/11/19
- Re: [OT] Linux Users, Malte Meyn, 2017/11/19
- Re: [OT] Linux Users, Abbé Jacques Peron, 2017/11/19
- Re: [OT] Linux Users, Abbé Jacques Peron, 2017/11/19
- Re: [OT] Linux Users, Abbé Jacques Peron, 2017/11/19
- Re: [OT] Linux Users, Abbé Jacques Peron, 2017/11/19
- Re: [OT] Linux Users, David Kastrup, 2017/11/19
- Re: [OT] Linux Users, Urs Liska, 2017/11/19
- Re: [OT] Linux Users, Henning Hraban Ramm, 2017/11/20