[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: scheme music function going backwards in time (or "better mp dolce")
From: |
Valentin Villenave |
Subject: |
Re: scheme music function going backwards in time (or "better mp dolce") [solved] |
Date: |
Tue, 14 Oct 2008 11:10:10 +0200 |
2008/10/4 Graham Percival <address@hidden>:
> This version of the files now do the following:
> - commands are placed after the note they belong to -- ie
> \pdolce behaves just like \p. Except for the "dolce" part. :)
Hi graham,
these functions are quite interesting, but would it be possible to
have a single function that takes two strings as arguments and makes
the appropriate composite dynamic mark?
e.g. instead of having to predefine
plegato = #(make-dynamic-extra "p" "legato")
and then use
\relative { c\plegato }
you could directly type
\relative { c\compDyn #"p" #"legato" }
So far, the only way I've found to do this is by using a music
function -- and that brings us back to the not-backwards-in-time
problem.
Cheers,
Valentin