[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Hiding whole measure rests from conductor score
From: |
Steve Schow |
Subject: |
RE: Hiding whole measure rests from conductor score |
Date: |
Mon, 09 Jul 2007 01:12:00 -0700 |
> Quoting Steve Schow <address@hidden>:
>
> > If you mean this is the answer:
> >
> > "When skipBars is set, the result will look OK, but the bar
> numbering
> > will be off."
>
> What do you mean that the bar numbering will be off. A multimeasure
> rest is counted as the corresponding number of measures, so the bar
> numbering will be exactly the same no matter if skipBars is
> set or not.
>
That's what it says in the manual and when I tried it out per the instructions,
that is what happens. When you use the multimeasure rest feature to say
indicate a 12 measure rest, it only increments the measure counter by 1. The
next measure is really measure 13 in the conductor score.
> One answer is provided in section "Hiding staves". Another answer
> is provided in section "Different editions from one source", which
> shows how to get for example R1*5 in the instrumental parts and s1*5
> in the full score, from the same LilyPond code.
>
I will investigate whatever you are trying to suggest that I don't understand
yet, later. Thanks.
RE: Hiding whole measure rests from conductor score,
Steve Schow <=