Re: GSoC 2017

[tisimst]

On Mon, Mar 6, 2017 at 3:34 PM, Urs Liska [via Lilypond] <
address@hidden> wrote:

> Of course it is good to have optical sizes - even if the vast majority
> of LilyPond users may not even be aware of it. And it's not depending on
> the number of different sizes in a score but already on a single staff
> size. If you want to engrave a pocket score requiring very small staves
> it's obviously better to have optical sizes that aren't simply scaled
> down.
> So we should definitely use the optical sizes equally when font handling
> is done by SMuFL, but (as you say) should be prepared that more or less
> any other font won't have it. (None of your fonts have it, Abraham,
> isn't it?).


At the moment, that's correct. I'm hoping to change this sometime this
year, though, time permitting. The root of this idea though is, how to
handle fonts that only have a single size and those that have multiple
sizes?




--
View this message in context: 
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/GSoC-2017-tp200631p200805.html
Sent from the Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.