[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: AccidentalCautionary in NullVoice
From: |
Dan Eble |
Subject: |
Re: AccidentalCautionary in NullVoice |
Date: |
Sat, 5 Jul 2014 15:37:31 -0400 |
On Feb 9, 2014, at 21:19 , Dan Eble <address@hidden> wrote:
> Here is a work-around for
> https://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=3834 which I suppose
> suggests both a resolution and a reason not to make a distinction between
> Accidental and AccidentalCautionary in the first place. (I understand there
> are probably good reasons to make a distinction or it wouldn’t be that way.)
Is it rude to ask if someone is willing to fix this in the near future?
There’s already a work-around described in the ticket; it just needs to be put
into Lilypond proper. (Well, a regression test would be nice too.)
Thanks,
—
Dan
- Re: AccidentalCautionary in NullVoice,
Dan Eble <=
- Re: AccidentalCautionary in NullVoice, Keith OHara, 2014/07/06
- Re: AccidentalCautionary in NullVoice, Dan Eble, 2014/07/06
- Re: AccidentalCautionary in NullVoice, Keith OHara, 2014/07/06
- Re: AccidentalCautionary in NullVoice, Mark Polesky, 2014/07/06
- Re: AccidentalCautionary in NullVoice, Janek Warchoł, 2014/07/07
- Re: AccidentalCautionary in NullVoice, Dan Eble, 2014/07/17
- Re: AccidentalCautionary in NullVoice, Janek Warchoł, 2014/07/20
- Re: AccidentalCautionary in NullVoice, Janek Warchoł, 2014/07/27