[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Bad example in Documentation since 2.17
From: |
Francisco Vila |
Subject: |
Bad example in Documentation since 2.17 |
Date: |
Wed, 2 Jul 2014 21:55:17 +0200 |
Hello,
When comparing examples in these pages,
http://www.lilypond.org/doc/v2.16/Documentation/notation/unpure_002dpure-containers.html
http://www.lilypond.org/doc/v2.17/Documentation/notation/unpure_002dpure-containers.html
"In the first measure, without the unpure-pure container, the
spacing engine does not know the width of the note head and lets it
collide with the accidentals. In the second measure, with unpure-pure
containers, the spacing engine knows the width of the note heads and
avoids the collision by lengthening the line accordingly. "
, I understand this is no longer true. For some reason, starting from
2.17 both measures look the same.
I found this while searching for a way to change the notehead to an
arbitrary glyph by its name in Feta font. BTW I have not found the way
and http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Search is unsurprisingly down.
--
Francisco Vila. Badajoz (Spain)
www.paconet.org , www.csmbadajoz.com
- Bad example in Documentation since 2.17,
Francisco Vila <=