Re: Add new merge-function.ly file for rests (issue4005046)

[pkx166h]

On 2011/01/24 16:20:20, c_sorensen_byu.edu wrote:

snip...

> But -- Neil's comment indicated that this approach wrong for getting
this
> functionality into the LilyPond distribution.  He suggests that a new
> engraver will be needed.

> Therefore, putting this up as an LSR snippet in the original form is
> probably the best thing to do right now, IMO.

> Thanks,

> Carl



No problem. What would be the best thing to do with this 'code' would
putting the 'patch' I have on the tracker issue, with explanation and
appropriate comments from this Rietveld thread, be the right thing if
only to save re-doing more work for anyone who'd like to tackle this?

Seems a waste to just close this inasmuch I as a lot of the grunt work
has been done; or maybe not - it wasn't a waste for me in terms of
learning though.

James


http://codereview.appspot.com/4005046/