Re: global staff-staff spacing fails in 2.13.46

[Trevor Daniels]

Keith OHara wrote Wednesday, January 19, 2011 7:25 AM


>  Follow-up patch attached.
>  The misleading bit was the implication that the properties always 
> contain alists, when one of them is by default a function 
> returning whichever alist is appropriate depending on whether the 
> staff is in a group.
>
>   This patch tells the truth about staff-staff-spacing, and amends 
> an example to use the simpler default-staff-staff-spacing so that 
> readers can use the grouped/ungrouped examples in the same file.

This looks fine to me.  I'll push it in a day or two if there are no 
adverse comments.

Thanks Keith.

Trevor