Re: global staff-staff spacing fails in 2.13.46

[Keith OHara]

On Sun, 16 Jan 2011 01:51:19 -0800, Trevor Daniels <address@hidden> wrote:
> I've pushed this patch, but isn't the immediately preceding text
> misleading,
> in that it says,
>
>
> "The following example demonstrates the two ways these alists can be
> modified. The first declaration updates one key-value individually,
> and the second completely re-defines the property:"?

Trevor, and list,
 Follow-up patch attached.
 The misleading bit was the implication that the properties always contain 
alists, when one of them is by default a function returning whichever alist is 
appropriate depending on whether the staff is in a group.

  This patch tells the truth about staff-staff-spacing, and amends an example 
to use the simpler default-staff-staff-spacing so that readers can use the 
grouped/ungrouped examples in the same file.

-Keith

0001-Doc-NR-spacing.itely-Clarify-un-gropued-staves.patch
Description: Binary data