[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: issue 1464 (was: a plea to new contributors)
|
From: |
Matthias Kilian |
|
Subject: |
Re: issue 1464 (was: a plea to new contributors) |
|
Date: |
Sun, 2 Jan 2011 12:43:36 +0100 |
|
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4.2.3i |
On Sun, Jan 02, 2011 at 12:35:28PM +0100, Matthias Kilian wrote:
> > In your original backtrace, is the X_AXIS parent of the Item in frame #2
> > 0x0? If so, I'm fine with the patch.
>
> You mean the g in line 197 of axis-group-interface.cc?
>
> Interval_t<int> rank_span = g->spanned_rank_interval ();
>
> No, it's not 0x0.
To clarify: g->dim_cache_[0].parent_ isn't 0x0.
Re: issue 1464 (was: a plea to new contributors), Neil Puttock, 2011/01/02
Message not available