[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: new smaller installers to test
From: |
Graham Percival |
Subject: |
Re: new smaller installers to test |
Date: |
Fri, 19 Feb 2010 07:50:42 +0000 |
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 4:51 AM, Graham Percival
<address@hidden> wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 11:25:33PM -0200, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
>> The largest ones are the Encoding files, which are related to
>> international fonts, so if this is the cause of the problem (I think
>> it is).
>
> ok, I'll test that when I get to university in a few hours.
Well, I tried the linux-x86 installer from yesterday's git, and it
built utf-8.ly just fine. Do the binaries in GUB use the
system-installer ghostscript setup if it can't find things from within
GUB?
Could other people try compiling a file with Chinese or Japanese
symbols using the official 2.13.13 ? I'd like to know whether it's
just the regtest-building that's broken, or the entire installer.
Cheers,
- Graham
- Pre-release testing, (continued)
Re: new smaller installers to test, Trevor Daniels, 2010/02/12
Re: new smaller installers to test, Patrick McCarty, 2010/02/12
Re: new smaller installers to test, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2010/02/17
- Re: new smaller installers to test, Graham Percival, 2010/02/18
- Re: new smaller installers to test, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2010/02/18
- Re: new smaller installers to test, Graham Percival, 2010/02/18
- Re: new smaller installers to test,
Graham Percival <=
- Re: new smaller installers to test, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2010/02/19
- Re: new smaller installers to test, Patrick McCarty, 2010/02/19
- Re: new smaller installers to test, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2010/02/19