[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: new smaller installers to test
From: |
Patrick McCarty |
Subject: |
Re: new smaller installers to test |
Date: |
Fri, 12 Feb 2010 13:52:01 -0800 |
On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 10:57 AM, Graham Percival
<address@hidden> wrote:
> I've tweaked the list of dirs to remove from
> share/ghostscript/Resources. The resulting files are (on average) 5
> megs smaller. linux-x86 works here for me.
>
> Could we get a few tests for various OSes?
> http://lilypond.org/~graham/
darwin-x86 and darwin-ppc work fine on clean 10.5 Leopard machines.
I've noticed some warnings from Ghostscript (when using --verbose) in
the past, and those are still present, so here they are for
completeness:
----------------------------------------
*** Warning: GenericResourceDir doesn't point to a valid resource directory.
the -sGenericResourceDir=... option can be used to set this.
WARNING: /Unicode /Decoding resource is not accessible but it is
useful for generating ToUnicode CMap.
----------------------------------------
...though they don't seem to affect the output, so I guess they are harmless.
Thanks,
Patrick
- new smaller installers to test, Graham Percival, 2010/02/12
- Re: new smaller installers to test, Trevor Daniels, 2010/02/12
- Re: new smaller installers to test,
Patrick McCarty <=
- Re: new smaller installers to test, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2010/02/17
- Re: new smaller installers to test, Graham Percival, 2010/02/18
- Re: new smaller installers to test, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2010/02/18
- Re: new smaller installers to test, Graham Percival, 2010/02/18
- Re: new smaller installers to test, Graham Percival, 2010/02/19
- Re: new smaller installers to test, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2010/02/19
- Re: new smaller installers to test, Patrick McCarty, 2010/02/19
- Re: new smaller installers to test, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2010/02/19