[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: new smaller installers to test
From: |
Han-Wen Nienhuys |
Subject: |
Re: new smaller installers to test |
Date: |
Thu, 18 Feb 2010 23:25:33 -0200 |
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 4:43 PM, Graham Percival
<address@hidden> wrote:
> woah, this is weird. The 2.13.12 regtest comparison shows them just fine:
> http://lilypond.org/test/v2.13.12-1/compare-v2.13.11-1/index.html
> (you can see the hiragana in utf-8.ly)
>
> the 2.13.13 regest doesn't show them changing:
> http://lilypond.org/test/v2.13.13-1/compare-v2.13.12-1/index.html
>
> however, they're missing from the 2.13.13 input/regression:
> http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.13/input/regression/df/lily-5e79810b.png
The regtest comparison uses the bounding boxes inside lilypond.
Errors in ghostscript dont generate differences inside lilypond, so
they are not registered in lilypond.
> Anybody have suggestions? I could simply revert the change, but it
> seemed that people liked the idea of saving some space. Does anybody
> know ghostscript and want to suggest which of these dirs I should try
> keeping?
> + 'share/ghostscript/*/Resource/{CMap,ColorSpace,Decoding}/',
> + 'share/ghostscript/*/Resource/{Encoding,Font,SubstCID}/',
>
> I don't know offhand how large each of those dirs are, but if it would
> help, I could build the package with the stripping commented out, and
> tell you exactly which files there are, and where they are.
The largest ones are the Encoding files, which are related to
international fonts, so if this is the cause of the problem (I think
it is).
You could also run the GS command by hand with -dQUIET switched off,
to see if it complains of missing Resource files.
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys - address@hidden - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen
- Re: new smaller installers to test, (continued)
- Re: new smaller installers to test, Trevor Daniels, 2010/02/12
- Re: new smaller installers to test, Patrick McCarty, 2010/02/12
- Re: new smaller installers to test, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2010/02/17
- Re: new smaller installers to test, Graham Percival, 2010/02/18
- Re: new smaller installers to test,
Han-Wen Nienhuys <=
- Re: new smaller installers to test, Graham Percival, 2010/02/18
- Re: new smaller installers to test, Graham Percival, 2010/02/19
- Re: new smaller installers to test, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2010/02/19
- Re: new smaller installers to test, Patrick McCarty, 2010/02/19
- Re: new smaller installers to test, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2010/02/19