Re: doc reorg (especially Usage) possibly finished

[Graham Percival]

On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 06:23:12PM +0200, Mats Bengtsson wrote:
> Quoting John Mandereau <address@hidden>:
>
>> Le dimanche 27 septembre 2009 à 19:08 +0100, Graham Percival a écrit :
>>> I'm wondering if we can call them "Function index" and "Concept
>>> index".  Or something like that.  It just seems weird to have a
>>> "LilyPond index" for every manual.
>>
>> Maybe "Function and concept index", as this index actually merges
>> concept index and function index?  I'm not sure this is better than
>> "LilyPond index".
>
> Still, it would be much better if we simply could call it "Index". Do
> we still have the silly technical problem that this would translate
> into file called index.html in the web version?

Yes... what about naming them by the book name?  Learning manual
index, Notation reference index, etc?

Cheers,
- Graham