|
From: | Mats Bengtsson |
Subject: | Re: doc reorg (especially Usage) possibly finished |
Date: | Mon, 28 Sep 2009 18:23:12 +0200 |
User-agent: | Internet Messaging Program (IMP) H3 (4.0.5) |
Quoting John Mandereau <address@hidden>:
Le dimanche 27 septembre 2009 à 19:08 +0100, Graham Percival a écrit :I'm wondering if we can call them "Function index" and "Concept index". Or something like that. It just seems weird to have a "LilyPond index" for every manual.Maybe "Function and concept index", as this index actually merges concept index and function index? I'm not sure this is better than "LilyPond index".
Still, it would be much better if we simply could call it "Index". Do we still have the silly technical problem that this would translate into file called index.html in the web version? /Mats
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |