[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: LSR update policies, and WTM is input/new/revised/ ?
From: |
Graham Percival |
Subject: |
Re: LSR update policies, and WTM is input/new/revised/ ? |
Date: |
Sat, 6 Jun 2009 13:50:55 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
On Sat, Jun 06, 2009 at 02:54:46PM -0500, Jonathan Kulp wrote:
> Graham, here's a patch with the script for running and checking
> all of the lsr snippets.
ok. IMO, osx users should set up a "lilypond" shell script, as
suggested in AU 2.something. Then you wouldn't need that special
path-to-binary thing. But adding this as-is certainly can't hurt
the next person doing the update, so that's fine.
> Also fixed a typo (Uptating > Updating). BTW there are a bunch of
> warnings when I run "make doc":
yeah, caused from that @include compile.texi. I've taken that
out; we'll revisit this after 2.14. (when AU dies and compiling
will only be in this dir)
Cheers,
- Graham
- LSR update policies, and WTM is input/new/revised/ ?, Graham Percival, 2009/06/04
- Re: LSR update policies, and WTM is input/new/revised/ ?, Jonathan Kulp, 2009/06/04
- Re: LSR update policies, and WTM is input/new/revised/ ?, Graham Percival, 2009/06/05
- Re: LSR update policies, and WTM is input/new/revised/ ?, Jonathan Kulp, 2009/06/06
- Re: LSR update policies, and WTM is input/new/revised/ ?,
Graham Percival <=
- Re: LSR update policies, and WTM is input/new/revised/ ?, Jonathan Kulp, 2009/06/06
- Re: LSR update policies, and WTM is input/new/revised/ ?, Graham Percival, 2009/06/07
- Re: LSR update policies, and WTM is input/new/revised/ ?, Jonathan Kulp, 2009/06/07