[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: LSR update policies, and WTM is input/new/revised/ ?
From: |
Graham Percival |
Subject: |
Re: LSR update policies, and WTM is input/new/revised/ ? |
Date: |
Fri, 5 Jun 2009 05:22:23 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
On Fri, Jun 05, 2009 at 01:17:01PM +0100, Neil Puttock wrote:
> 2009/6/5 Graham Percival <address@hidden>:
> > Yeah, but there are differences --
> > input/new/revised/rest-styles.ly doesn't contain tiny rests for
> > the mensural and neomensural. The version in LSR contains those
> > rests in the .ly file, but they aren't printed.
>
> They're spacer rests to ensure the snippet is displayed correctly
> within LSR, since the mensural styles don't support r64/128.
Oops! I didn't notice that. Sorry.
> Sorry to cause confusion; I should have deleted the folder ages ago.
Well, I could have avoided adding confusion if I'd read a bit more
carefully.
Cheers,
- Graham
- LSR update policies, and WTM is input/new/revised/ ?, Graham Percival, 2009/06/04
- Re: LSR update policies, and WTM is input/new/revised/ ?, Jonathan Kulp, 2009/06/04
- Re: LSR update policies, and WTM is input/new/revised/ ?, Graham Percival, 2009/06/05
- Re: LSR update policies, and WTM is input/new/revised/ ?, Jonathan Kulp, 2009/06/06
- Re: LSR update policies, and WTM is input/new/revised/ ?, Graham Percival, 2009/06/06
- Re: LSR update policies, and WTM is input/new/revised/ ?, Jonathan Kulp, 2009/06/06
- Re: LSR update policies, and WTM is input/new/revised/ ?, Graham Percival, 2009/06/07
- Re: LSR update policies, and WTM is input/new/revised/ ?, Jonathan Kulp, 2009/06/07