[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: LSR update policies, and WTM is input/new/revised/ ?
From: |
Graham Percival |
Subject: |
Re: LSR update policies, and WTM is input/new/revised/ ? |
Date: |
Fri, 5 Jun 2009 04:12:18 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
On Thu, Jun 04, 2009 at 07:46:10PM -0500, Jonathan Kulp wrote:
> I read the diff for CG when it came in this morning and the LSR stuff
> looks good to me. If you want, we could also include the script I wrote
> for checking all the snippets at once. Carl suggested that it go in the
> docs somewhere.
Yes, please. In that new subsection would be great.
> I ran the files in input/new/revised/ and they all compiled. I don't
> understand what they're doing in there. I just checked and all of them
> are in the LSR and compile properly.
Yeah, but there are differences --
input/new/revised/rest-styles.ly doesn't contain tiny rests for
the mensural and neomensural. The version in LSR contains those
rests in the .ly file, but they aren't printed.
I therefore suspect that all these files are updated/better
versions of the LSR snippets, and should therefore be merged.
Could you compare each pair of files (input/new/revised/ and LSR
snippet) and make the LSR version the "final" version, then delete
this dir from git?
Cheers,
- Graham
- LSR update policies, and WTM is input/new/revised/ ?, Graham Percival, 2009/06/04
- Re: LSR update policies, and WTM is input/new/revised/ ?, Jonathan Kulp, 2009/06/04
- Re: LSR update policies, and WTM is input/new/revised/ ?,
Graham Percival <=
- Re: LSR update policies, and WTM is input/new/revised/ ?, Jonathan Kulp, 2009/06/06
- Re: LSR update policies, and WTM is input/new/revised/ ?, Graham Percival, 2009/06/06
- Re: LSR update policies, and WTM is input/new/revised/ ?, Jonathan Kulp, 2009/06/06
- Re: LSR update policies, and WTM is input/new/revised/ ?, Graham Percival, 2009/06/07
- Re: LSR update policies, and WTM is input/new/revised/ ?, Jonathan Kulp, 2009/06/07