[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GUB on kainhofer: still cross/gcc
From: |
Graham Percival |
Subject: |
Re: GUB on kainhofer: still cross/gcc |
Date: |
Tue, 2 Jun 2009 08:18:24 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
On Tue, Jun 02, 2009 at 04:30:36PM +0200, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
> Op dinsdag 02-06-2009 om 07:02 uur [tijdzone -0700], schreef Graham
> Percival:
> > 1) this affects darwin-x86, not darwin-ppc. (at least, I haven't
> > tested darwin-ppc, only darwin-x86).
>
> Interesting. I missed that bit.
>
> Your original report is about ppc, right?
>
> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2009-03/msg00356.html
Huh, true. I didn't notice that.
I've only been testing darwin-x86 for the past 1 or 2 weeks --
simply because
bin/gub darwin-x86::cross/gcc
is the first example in the README. :)
> > AttributeError: 'Odcctools__darwin__x86' object has no attribute
> > 'build_bits'
>
> Ah, that should prolly be self.settings. I'll wait a bit until
> x86/ppc is cleared up.
With the addition of "self.settings", it works for darwin-x86.
I'm testing darwin-ppc now.
Cheers,
- Graham
- Re: GUB on kainhofer: still cross/gcc, Graham Percival, 2009/06/01
- Re: GUB on kainhofer: still cross/gcc, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2009/06/02
- Re: GUB on kainhofer: still cross/gcc, Graham Percival, 2009/06/02
- Re: GUB on kainhofer: still cross/gcc, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2009/06/02
- Re: GUB on kainhofer: still cross/gcc, Graham Percival, 2009/06/02
- Re: GUB on kainhofer: still cross/gcc, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2009/06/02
- Re: GUB on kainhofer: still cross/gcc,
Graham Percival <=
- Re: GUB on kainhofer: still cross/gcc, Graham Percival, 2009/06/03
- Re: GUB on kainhofer: still cross/gcc, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2009/06/03