[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GUB on kainhofer: still cross/gcc
From: |
Graham Percival |
Subject: |
Re: GUB on kainhofer: still cross/gcc |
Date: |
Tue, 2 Jun 2009 07:02:16 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
On Tue, Jun 02, 2009 at 12:28:29PM +0200, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
> Op dinsdag 02-06-2009 om 03:05 uur [tijdzone -0700], schreef Graham
> Percival:
>
> > Anyway, with this patch, the darwin-x86::cross/gcc build
> > succeedes:
>
> Great. I've just pushed this, with an extra if:
>
> if self.build_bits == '32' and self.build_hardware_bits == '64':
>
> to narrow down the change even more.
Two problems:
1) this affects darwin-x86, not darwin-ppc. (at least, I haven't
tested darwin-ppc, only darwin-x86).
2) File "bin/../gub/context.py", line 110, in
get_constant_substitution_dict
val = method ()
File "/home/lilypond/gub/gub/specs/darwin/odcctools.py", line
75, in configure_command
if self.build_bits == '32' and self.build_hardware_bits ==
'64':
AttributeError: 'Odcctools__darwin__x86' object has no attribute
'build_bits'
Cheers,
- Graham
- Re: GUB on kainhofer: still cross/gcc, Graham Percival, 2009/06/01
- Re: GUB on kainhofer: still cross/gcc, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2009/06/02
- Re: GUB on kainhofer: still cross/gcc, Graham Percival, 2009/06/02
- Re: GUB on kainhofer: still cross/gcc, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2009/06/02
- Re: GUB on kainhofer: still cross/gcc,
Graham Percival <=
- Re: GUB on kainhofer: still cross/gcc, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2009/06/02
- Re: GUB on kainhofer: still cross/gcc, Graham Percival, 2009/06/02
- Re: GUB on kainhofer: still cross/gcc, Graham Percival, 2009/06/03
- Re: GUB on kainhofer: still cross/gcc, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2009/06/03