[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GUB on kainhofer: still cross/gcc
From: |
Graham Percival |
Subject: |
Re: GUB on kainhofer: still cross/gcc |
Date: |
Mon, 1 Jun 2009 00:15:17 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
On Sun, May 31, 2009 at 09:20:24PM +0200, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
> diff --git a/gub/specs/darwin/odcctools.py b/gub/specs/darwin/odcctools.py
> index ee953c0..1d24944 100644
> --- a/gub/specs/darwin/odcctools.py
> +++ b/gub/specs/darwin/odcctools.py
> @@ -62,3 +62,8 @@ cd %(install_prefix)s%(cross_dir)s/bin && ln
> %(toolchain_prefix)sstrip ../%(targ
> def install (self):
> cross.AutoBuild.install (self)
> self.install_librestrict_stat_helpers ()
> +
> +class Odcctools__darwin__ppc (Odcctools):
> + def configure_command (self):
> + return (Odcctools.configure_command (self)
> + + ' CFLAGS=-fno-stack-protector')
Update: according to
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/CompilerFlags
the "*** buffer overflow detected" message comes from
-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE, not -fstack-protector. I'm trying it now with
this option disabled; I'll report back in a few hours.
Cheers,
- Graham
- Re: GUB on kainhofer: still cross/gcc, Graham Percival, 2009/06/01
- Re: GUB on kainhofer: still cross/gcc, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2009/06/02
- Re: GUB on kainhofer: still cross/gcc, Graham Percival, 2009/06/02
- Re: GUB on kainhofer: still cross/gcc, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2009/06/02
- Re: GUB on kainhofer: still cross/gcc, Graham Percival, 2009/06/02
- Re: GUB on kainhofer: still cross/gcc, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2009/06/02
- Re: GUB on kainhofer: still cross/gcc, Graham Percival, 2009/06/02
- Re: GUB on kainhofer: still cross/gcc, Graham Percival, 2009/06/03
- Re: GUB on kainhofer: still cross/gcc, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2009/06/03