[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [libreplanet-discuss] Is Stallman nuts?
From: |
lily |
Subject: |
Re: [libreplanet-discuss] Is Stallman nuts? |
Date: |
Sun, 15 Sep 2019 18:01:06 +0000 |
If it is true that Stallman called these victims as willing. I entirely agree
with Marry-Anne. The Free Software movement already lacks female support and
these comments will only push more women away. I as a woman who has also
suffered harrassment as a child and as an adult, do not want a leader who says
things that hurt women. Stallman, you cannot do this. We as members must be
strong and have someone else represent us period. FSF should take a stand and
provide support for women and actively invite women to a space where we know we
are supported, believed in and respected.
Lily
-------- Original Message --------
On Sep 15, 2019, 10:35 AM, MARY-ANNE WOLF wrote:
> https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/9ke3ke/famed-computer-scientist-richard-stallman-described-epstein-victims-as-entirely-willing
>
> https://medium.com/@selamie/remove-richard-stallman-fec6ec210794
>
> I have been a financial supporter of FSF since... 2011 at least. I first used
> emacs in... the 1980's I think it was.
>
> Way to drive away any female supporter of FSF and Libre software generally,
> Richard! I really did think you were smarter than that.
>
> Look! A person underage (and the age is defined differently in different
> states) CANNOT give consent to sex. That is why there is such a thing as
> statutory rape. Thus, whether the young lady was paid (and prostitution is
> also illegal in most places, and transporting someone for purpose of
> prostitution also) and whether she was willing in any other sense, if she was
> too young, she CANNOT have given consent to sex, so the sex MUST have been
> rape as legally defined.
>
> If Stallman is too stupid to understand that, the FSF needs to throw him out
> with force and distance itself from him as fast as they can, before FSF loses
> the support of most of its female supporters and a large fraction of its more
> woke male supporters.
>
> Is Stallman nuts?
>
> Mary-Anne
> _______________________________________________
> libreplanet-discuss mailing list
> libreplanet-discuss@libreplanet.org
> https://lists.libreplanet.org/mailman/listinfo/libreplanet-discuss
- Re: [libreplanet-discuss] Is Stallman nuts?, (continued)
- Re: [libreplanet-discuss] Is Stallman nuts?, Federico klez Culloca, 2019/09/15
- Re: [libreplanet-discuss] Is Stallman nuts?, TechLibre, 2019/09/15
- Re: [libreplanet-discuss] Is Stallman nuts?, Betsy Garrett, 2019/09/15
- Re: [libreplanet-discuss] Is Stallman nuts?, Leah Rowe, 2019/09/15
- Re: [libreplanet-discuss] Is Stallman nuts?, TechLibre, 2019/09/15
- Re: [libreplanet-discuss] Is Stallman nuts?, Andrew Luke Nesbit, 2019/09/15
Re: [libreplanet-discuss] Is Stallman nuts?, TechLibre, 2019/09/15
Re: [libreplanet-discuss] Is Stallman nuts?, Thomas Lord, 2019/09/15
Re: [libreplanet-discuss] Is Stallman nuts?, Mark Phelan, 2019/09/15
Re: [libreplanet-discuss] Is Stallman nuts?, Robert Call (Bob), 2019/09/16
Re: [libreplanet-discuss] Is Stallman nuts?,
lily <=
Re: [libreplanet-discuss] Is Stallman nuts?, Patrick 'P. J.' McDermott, 2019/09/16
Re: [libreplanet-discuss] Is Stallman nuts?, quiliro, 2019/09/17