[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [libreplanet-discuss] Potential of the Sleepycat License

From: Ineiev
Subject: Re: [libreplanet-discuss] Potential of the Sleepycat License
Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2017 02:05:03 -0400
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)

On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 10:39:13PM -0300, Adonay Felipe Nogueira wrote:
> LGPL is copyleft, but the copyleft "preservation" part is required
> mainly when the user makes changes to the original (LGPL'd) work
> *itself*, this is why it's a weak copyleft license, while a simple
> dependency on the LGPL'd work wouldn't need to carry the same or
> compatible license (unless if statically linked, if I'm not mistaken).

And for statically linked applications, the LGPLv3 provides
the 4d0 option.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]