[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [libreplanet-discuss] Potential of the Sleepycat License

From: Adonay Felipe Nogueira
Subject: Re: [libreplanet-discuss] Potential of the Sleepycat License
Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2017 22:39:13 -0300
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1 (gnu/linux)

LGPL is copyleft, but the copyleft "preservation" part is required
mainly when the user makes changes to the original (LGPL'd) work
*itself*, this is why it's a weak copyleft license, while a simple
dependency on the LGPL'd work wouldn't need to carry the same or
compatible license (unless if statically linked, if I'm not mistaken).

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]