Re: Implementing missing toolbox/package functions

[Svante Signell]

On Thu, 2010-09-23 at 17:48 -0400, John W. Eaton wrote:
> On 23-Sep-2010, David Bateman wrote:
> 
> | There is a coding guide for Octave in general at
> | 
> | 
> http://www.gnu.org/software/octave/doc/interpreter/Contributing-Guidelines.html#Contributing-Guidelines
> | 
> | but for the raised cosine functions, I'd say its also important to 
> | respect as much as possible the interface defined by matlab
> 
> And, since I don't think it can be said too many times, it is
> essential that your implementation is your original work.  Should it
> be available to you, you must not examine the code from the
> corresponding Matlab toolbox to implement your version.

OK, point taken I will not do that. Is it allowed to run the help in
Matlab for these functions to find out the interface? Otherwise, being
Matlab compatible would be difficult.