[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: NonGNU ELPA
From: |
Emanuel Berg |
Subject: |
Re: NonGNU ELPA |
Date: |
Sat, 22 Jan 2022 07:42:26 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Po Lu wrote:
>> This must be the cleanest, compile Emacs without X, use
>> xsel.el [1] to communicate from Emacs to X, and from X to
>> Emacs (it is a theoretical possibility not observed in the
>> wild), _and_ from Emacs to the other ttys - without passing
>> X, which still has to run for it to work.
>
> If you're running Emacs under X (which most people should be
> doing anyway), then the best solution would certainly to use
> the built-in X selection support.
1) Read
2) Think
3) ...
> xsel.el is only clean if you're running Emacs without X for
> whatever reason.
Recommended move:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clueless
Alicia Silverstone.
That's right! Positive thinking, man ...
--
underground experts united
https://dataswamp.org/~incal
- Re: NonGNU ELPA, (continued)
- Re: NonGNU ELPA, Stefan Monnier, 2022/01/17
- Re: NonGNU ELPA, Emanuel Berg, 2022/01/17
- Re: NonGNU ELPA, Stefan Monnier, 2022/01/17
- Re: NonGNU ELPA, Emanuel Berg, 2022/01/21
- Re: NonGNU ELPA, Stefan Monnier, 2022/01/21
- Re: NonGNU ELPA, Emanuel Berg, 2022/01/21
- Re: NonGNU ELPA, Emanuel Berg, 2022/01/22
- Re: NonGNU ELPA, Po Lu, 2022/01/22
- Re: NonGNU ELPA, Emanuel Berg, 2022/01/22
- Re: NonGNU ELPA, Po Lu, 2022/01/22
- Re: NonGNU ELPA,
Emanuel Berg <=
- Re: NonGNU ELPA, Po Lu, 2022/01/22
- Re: NonGNU ELPA, Jean Louis, 2022/01/22
- Re: NonGNU ELPA, Po Lu, 2022/01/22
- Re: NonGNU ELPA, Jean Louis, 2022/01/22
- Re: NonGNU ELPA, Emanuel Berg, 2022/01/22
- Re: NonGNU ELPA, Jean Louis, 2022/01/23
- Re: NonGNU ELPA, Stefan Monnier, 2022/01/23
- Re: NonGNU ELPA, Emanuel Berg, 2022/01/23
- Re: NonGNU ELPA, Emanuel Berg, 2022/01/22
- Re: NonGNU ELPA, Emanuel Berg, 2022/01/22