[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Is Elisp really that slow?

From: Óscar Fuentes
Subject: Re: Is Elisp really that slow?
Date: Thu, 16 May 2019 15:40:02 +0200
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux)

Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> writes:

>> From: Óscar Fuentes <address@hidden>
>> Date: Wed, 15 May 2019 22:09:32 +0200
>> Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> writes:
>> >> > "Outside Savannah" is not relevant when we talk about Emacs.
>> If people are implementing the features but can't be integrated in stock
>> Emacs, the Savannah boundary becomes relevant.
> Not for this thread, which deals specifically with what's available in
> Emacs OOB.

I'm sure the authors of those packages would be happy to see them
integrated on Emacs but...

>> >> Assuming that the authors have no problem assigning their copyrights
>> >> to FSF, what prevents the outside work from being integrated into
>> >> Emacs in Savannah to improve Emacs's C++ IDE features?
>> >
>> > Under those assumptions, and if that work doesn't use any non-free
>> > software, nothing.
>> Unfortunately, this is not true.
> Yes, it is.

... they work on top of Clang which, as you very well know, exclude them
from being incorporated in Emacs.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]