help-gnu-emacs
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Is Elisp really that slow?


From: Eli Zaretskii
Subject: Re: Is Elisp really that slow?
Date: Thu, 16 May 2019 17:06:58 +0300

> From: Óscar Fuentes <address@hidden>
> Date: Thu, 16 May 2019 15:40:02 +0200
> 
> Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> writes:
> 
> >> From: Óscar Fuentes <address@hidden>
> >> Date: Wed, 15 May 2019 22:09:32 +0200
> >> 
> >> Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> writes:
> >> 
> >> >> > "Outside Savannah" is not relevant when we talk about Emacs.
> >> 
> >> If people are implementing the features but can't be integrated in stock
> >> Emacs, the Savannah boundary becomes relevant.
> >
> > Not for this thread, which deals specifically with what's available in
> > Emacs OOB.
> 
> I'm sure the authors of those packages would be happy to see them
> integrated on Emacs but...

It frequently is not enough to be happy about including something,
there are other factors.

> >> >> Assuming that the authors have no problem assigning their copyrights
> >> >> to FSF, what prevents the outside work from being integrated into
> >> >> Emacs in Savannah to improve Emacs's C++ IDE features?
> >> >
> >> > Under those assumptions, and if that work doesn't use any non-free
> >> > software, nothing.
> >> 
> >> Unfortunately, this is not true.
> >
> > Yes, it is.
> 
> ... they work on top of Clang which, as you very well know, exclude them
> from being incorporated in Emacs.

It does?



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]