[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Is Emacs very alive, active and improving?
From: |
Kai Grossjohann |
Subject: |
Re: Is Emacs very alive, active and improving? |
Date: |
Sat, 12 Oct 2013 13:57:46 -0700 (PDT) |
User-agent: |
G2/1.0 |
On Saturday, October 12, 2013 10:39:40 PM UTC+2, Emanuel Berg wrote:
> Kai Grossjohann <kai.grossjohann@gmail.com> writes:
>
>
>
> > Emacs was written in 1985, so it will be 30 years old
> > soon. I think it can go on another 30 years :-)
>
> Well, no disrespect to the 1985 people, but didn't
> countless of people work on Emacs, every single day
> since, and still do?
Apologies. I meant to say that _the first version_ of (GNU) Emacs was
published in 1985.
Kai
- Re: Is Emacs very alive, active and improving?, (continued)
- Re: Is Emacs very alive, active and improving?, Kai Grossjohann, 2013/10/12
- RE: Is Emacs very alive, active and improving?, Drew Adams, 2013/10/12
- Re: Is Emacs very alive, active and improving?, Emanuel Berg, 2013/10/12
- Message not available
- Re: Is Emacs very alive, active and improving?, Kai Grossjohann, 2013/10/12
- RE: Is Emacs very alive, active and improving?, Drew Adams, 2013/10/12
- Re: Is Emacs very alive, active and improving?, Emanuel Berg, 2013/10/12
- Re: Is Emacs very alive, active and improving?, Kai Großjohann, 2013/10/13
- Message not available
- Re: Is Emacs very alive, active and improving?, Emanuel Berg, 2013/10/13
Re: Is Emacs very alive, active and improving?, Eric Brown, 2013/10/13