[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: What's the state of the art for mail?
From: |
Xavier Maillard |
Subject: |
Re: What's the state of the art for mail? |
Date: |
Tue, 29 Jun 2004 17:36:26 -0000 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110003 (No Gnus v0.3) Emacs/21.3.50 (gnu/linux) |
On 9 jun 2004, kj wrote:
> After all these years good ol' RMAIL's limitations are
> *finally* getting to me. I've stuck with it mostly out of
> inertia, and because it works well with Emacs.
>
> My main concerns are to be able to use Emacs (or a faithful
> Emacs-like interface) to read my mail on Linux, to have no
> problems with MIME attachments, and no BABYL! (Availability of
> a Debian package is always a plus.)
>
> Thanks for your suggestions!
>
> kj
>
> PS: I'm a bit leery about MH, mostly because a friend of mine
> who has used exmh for almost 10 years tells me that its MIME
> handling is a little bit long in the tooth. In particular, she
> noted that one needs to jump through hoops to make the quoting
> of messages that have MIME attachments work right.
Gnus is the way to go even if there are plenty of other MUAs.
--
In Gruuik we trust