[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: A plan for parameterized packages
From: |
raingloom |
Subject: |
Re: A plan for parameterized packages |
Date: |
Sun, 15 Nov 2020 22:24:29 +0100 |
On Sun, 15 Nov 2020 21:46:58 +0100
Danny Milosavljevic <dannym@scratchpost.org> wrote:
> Hi Ludo,
>
> nice feature!
>
> On Sun, 15 Nov 2020 17:33:28 +0100
> Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> wrote:
>
> > An important question: do we have examples of packages for which
> > we’d like to have parameters?
>
> For the embedded/flash rom side:
>
> * Enable/disable building the documentation. I really don't need a
> 40 MiB manual stored onto a 16 MiB firmware flash chip. If that's
> better done as an extra output, fair enough.
> ......
Alpine already achieves an incredibly tiny install size by splitting
packages into many outputs. We could and should do the same.
As far as I know, they do not have parameterized packages.
- Re: A plan for parameterized packages, (continued)
Re: A plan for parameterized packages, zimoun, 2020/11/15
Re: A plan for parameterized packages, Taylan Kammer, 2020/11/15
Re: A plan for parameterized packages, Danny Milosavljevic, 2020/11/15
Re: A plan for parameterized packages,
raingloom <=
Re: A plan for parameterized packages, Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli, 2020/11/19
Re: A plan for parameterized packages, Ludovic Courtès, 2020/11/20
Re: A plan for parameterized packages, zimoun, 2020/11/20
Re: A plan for parameterized packages, Christopher Baines, 2020/11/20
Re: A plan for parameterized packages, Ludovic Courtès, 2020/11/16
Re: A plan for parameterized packages, Stephen Christie, 2020/11/17