[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Make mutiple packages from outputs (Was: A plan for parameterized pa
From: |
zimoun |
Subject: |
Re: Make mutiple packages from outputs (Was: A plan for parameterized packages) |
Date: |
Mon, 16 Nov 2020 16:10:24 +0100 |
Hi,
On Mon, 16 Nov 2020 at 19:25, 宋文武 <iyzsong@outlook.com> wrote:
>> And it is maybe an occasion to revisit the museum, i.e., the TODO file:
[...]
> I'd like to suggest another plan: Make every ‘output’ become a <package>
> object, so ‘propagated-build-inputs’ doesn’t need to change. Then we’ll
> have something like debian’s source/binary packages [1] and archlinux’s
> base/split packages [2].
On the importance of visiting museum! :-)
Cheers,
simon
- Re: A plan for parameterized packages, (continued)
Re: A plan for parameterized packages, zimoun, 2020/11/15
Re: A plan for parameterized packages, Taylan Kammer, 2020/11/15
Re: A plan for parameterized packages, Danny Milosavljevic, 2020/11/15
Re: A plan for parameterized packages, raingloom, 2020/11/15
Re: A plan for parameterized packages, Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli, 2020/11/19
Re: A plan for parameterized packages, Ludovic Courtès, 2020/11/20
Re: A plan for parameterized packages, zimoun, 2020/11/20
Re: A plan for parameterized packages, Christopher Baines, 2020/11/20
Re: A plan for parameterized packages, Ludovic Courtès, 2020/11/16
Re: A plan for parameterized packages, Stephen Christie, 2020/11/17