[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: guix package --search slow ?
From: |
zimoun |
Subject: |
Re: guix package --search slow ? |
Date: |
Wed, 15 May 2019 20:32:24 +0200 |
Hi,
My bad !
On Wed, 15 May 2019 at 15:34, Ludovic Courtès <address@hidden> wrote:
> The warm-cache timings are comparable though, which I think is good.
> :-)
`aptitude search` is not equivalent to `guix package --search` but to
`guix package --list-available`.
The `aptitude` equivalence should be `aptitude search '?term(numpy)'`
And now, Guix is better. ;-)
$ time guix package -s numpy
real 0m7.924s
user 0m1.240s
sys 0m0.144s
$ time guix package -s conduit
real 0m0.758s
user 0m0.796s
sys 0m0.044s
compared to:
$ time aptitude search '?term(numpy)'
real 0m7.393s
user 0m1.556s
sys 0m0.628s
$ time aptitude search '?term(conduit)'
real 0m1.824s
user 0m1.352s
sys 0m0.464s
However, I still think that a SQL caching file containing also
descriptions should improve the searching experience with cold cache.
Thanks! Now I have better understood some internals. :-)
All the best,
simon
- Re: guix package --search slow ?, (continued)
- Re: guix package --search slow ?, Jonathan Brielmaier, 2019/05/15
- Re: guix package --search slow ?, Pierre Neidhardt, 2019/05/15
- Re: guix package --search slow ?, zimoun, 2019/05/15
- Re: guix package --search slow ?, Pierre Neidhardt, 2019/05/15
- Re: guix package --search slow ?, zimoun, 2019/05/15
- Re: guix package --search slow ?, zimoun, 2019/05/15
- Re: guix package --search slow ?,
zimoun <=
- Re: guix package --search slow ?, Giovanni Biscuolo, 2019/05/15
Re: guix package --search slow ?, Meiyo Peng, 2019/05/14