[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: list building
|
From: |
Joshua Judson Rosen |
|
Subject: |
Re: list building |
|
Date: |
Thu, 15 Jan 2004 20:44:13 -0500 |
|
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.4i |
On Wed, Jan 14, 2004 at 01:48:28PM -0500, Lynn Winebarger wrote:
> Stephen Compall wrote:
> >Matt Hellige <address@hidden> writes:
> >
> >(set! output-list (cons* (getd pref-login) (gids) (sgids pref-login)
> > output-list))
> >
> >Particularly as the original pushed `sgids' first, IIRC. cons* is your
> >friend.
>
> Better to take TTN's advice if there's any portability desired.
> Order of evaluation is not specified by the scheme standard.
Why does that matter?
You're thinking that getd, gids, and/or sgids might have side-effects
that influence each other, I take it?
--
"Don't worry about people stealing your ideas. If your ideas are any good,
you'll have to ram them down people's throats." --Howard Aiken
pgptYLYJGdzgm.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- Re: list building, (continued)
Re: list building, Marius Vollmer, 2004/01/14
Re: list building, Matt Hellige, 2004/01/14
Re: list building, Keith Wright, 2004/01/15