[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Death of -glib, Life of -platform
From: |
Andy Wingo |
Subject: |
Re: Death of -glib, Life of -platform |
Date: |
Tue, 14 Sep 2004 22:35:56 +0200 |
Hi Jan,
On Mon, 2004-09-13 at 15:50 +0200, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
> Andy Wingo writes:
>
> > * I don't know how libgnomecanvas ever worked; it seems
> > gnome-canvas-item-new should have failed always. Jan?
>
> Why do you think that? See libgnomecanvas/examples/canvas.scm for
> uses of gnome-canvas-item-new; that worked when I checked it in.
Because gnome-canvas-item-new takes varargs. Perhaps my canvas tree is
not up-to-date though. Not quite sure what's going on there.
Beside the point, there should be no need for procedural constructors.
(make <foo-class>) should do it. I've written a canvas app in C before,
I know that gnome-canvas-item-new does something else too. However, one
should be able to do that with a custom initialize method for the class,
or something along those lines.
Regards,
--
Andy Wingo <address@hidden>
http://ambient.2y.net/wingo/
- Death of -glib, Life of -platform, Andy Wingo, 2004/09/13
- Re: Death of -glib, Life of -platform, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2004/09/13
- Re: Death of -glib, Life of -platform,
Andy Wingo <=
- Re: Death of -glib, Life of -platform, Andreas Rottmann, 2004/09/13
- Re: Death of -glib, Life of -platform, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2004/09/13
- Re: Death of -glib, Life of -platform, Andreas Rottmann, 2004/09/13
- Re: Death of -glib, Life of -platform, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2004/09/13
- Re: Death of -glib, Life of -platform, Andreas Rottmann, 2004/09/14
- Re: Death of -glib, Life of -platform, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2004/09/14
- Re: Death of -glib, Life of -platform, Andy Wingo, 2004/09/15
- Re: Death of -glib, Life of -platform, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2004/09/15